Nobody can say we did not try.
At 13.26 on 30 September 2015, we received the following sad news about SIP 9 in an email from the IPA.
“The consultation process elicited a variety of opinions about the desirability, or otherwise, of continuing to provide a suggested format for the provision of information. The JIC considered it should give pre-eminence to the views expressed by major creditors and emphasise the importance of the narrative elements of an office holders’ reports and requests. The final version of the SIP will not, therefore, contain a suggested format.”
We are gutted, but we were always trying to fight much bigger opponents. We hope that the extra cost and confusion will be worth it.
At 13.26 on 30 September 2015, we received the following sad news about SIP 9 in an email from the IPA.
“The consultation process elicited a variety of opinions about the desirability, or otherwise, of continuing to provide a suggested format for the provision of information. The JIC considered it should give pre-eminence to the views expressed by major creditors and emphasise the importance of the narrative elements of an office holders’ reports and requests. The final version of the SIP will not, therefore, contain a suggested format.”
We are gutted, but we were always trying to fight much bigger opponents. We hope that the extra cost and confusion will be worth it.
